What does it define about art? Either it is the medium? No, because anything can be made with it and the only thing those obstacles the artistic from doing so is the last line of technology. An artist would make and give a shape air if he can, or twist plasma into defined forms if it was possible. There is a major role plays by material but it is not material dependent.

Is it the type of the result? We couldn't say art as simply printings on canvas, or sculptures in bronze or stone. Modern art uses colorful or unusual materials. In future, that is the digital nature that we can see partial view in our daily lives; digital art while not identified by most of the respected people as real art, is supposed to important as such by other people. Thus the name digital "art". No, what from it takes it is not that, though it's a part pf a whole to its nature.

Then is it the regarded value? May be this is the most perfect of its definition. Oppositely, the definition is perfect, infactly it is silent the opposite. People have different figures of variable things, and no two people will see same thing and have alike emotions. We suppose an art is something valuable, then it is not necessary everyone should be valued it like that. A painting is looked by someone and he say it art bt another person says it is trash.

To define it, is one of the hardest works. There is not just one definition and opposing arguments carry on about what art is and what is art. If we said that it was a perplex task of material, form and value, then we could not understand it as a whole but anyhow shows a part of the whole of the real meaning.